Philadelphia Court Grants Summary Judgment in Medical Malpractice Action

Mark Merlini successfully argued a Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of a hospital before the Honorable Sandra Mazer Moss in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff, a 40 year old male, claimed that he was negligently discharged from the Emergency Room after sustaining a tibial plateau fracture and that he developed a serious medical condition, compartment syndrome, as a result. Plaintiff’s demand was $10 million. Plaintiff’s counsel took the position that he did not require standard of care expert testimony in the case because the alleged negligence was obvious.

Therefore, Plaintiff’s counsel intended to rely upon the testimony of a neurologist to establish that the failure to admit the patient resulted in the claimed damage to the patient’s leg, which ultimately resulted in several surgeries. The Court agreed with the defense position and ruled that expert testimony on liability was required and that the Plaintiff’s neurology expert was not qualified to offer expert testimony regarding emergency room care. All claims against the hospital and Co-Defendant ER Physician were dismissed with prejudice following oral argument.

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Challenge to Settlement

On June 10, 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by citizens of the Town of Dewey Beach, Delaware seeking to overturn the settlement of an earlier lawsuit brought against the Town by a property owner seeking to redevelop a parcel of land within the Town.

The court en banc heard oral argument in Murray v. Town of Dewey Beach, et al. on April 10, and issued an opinion applying a statute of repose found at 10 Del. C. §8126 to hold that the Plaintiffs’ claims were untimely and therefore barred.  In so holding, the court agreed with the arguments advanced by the Town and the property owner, that 10 Del. C. §8126, which provides that challenges to certain types of land use actions must be brought within 60 days after public notice of the actions, was intended to be broadly construed.

Megan Mantzavinos, Esquire, a partner in Marks O’Neill’s Delaware office, argued the case on behalf of the Town of Dewey Beach.

New Jersey Supreme Court grants Certification on Interpretation of New Jersey Civil Rights Act

Sean Kelly from Marks O’Neill’s New Jersey office successfully obtained dismissal in two related matters involving allegations of violations of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act by a local business.  Both matters have worked their way through the Appellate courts.   The New Jersey Supreme Court recently agreed to grant Certification in both matters.  The issue to be resolved will be whether the language of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act permits constitutional claims to be brought against private individuals, or only those acting under color of state law.