SWIFT AND ZEALOUS DEFENSE BY MOODK ATTORNEYS LEADS TO EARLY DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST CLIENTS IN MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CASE

MOODK Philadelphia attorneys, Kevin J. O’Brien and Casey G. McCurdy, obtained early dismissals for their clients involving a tragic accident on Broad Street which resulted in the amputation of both of Plaintiff’s legs. Plaintiff was unloading furniture on Broad Street outside of a condominium complex when he was struck full-speed by another vehicle. Plaintiff sued the condominium association and property management company asserting negligence and arguing that both defendants failed to provide a usable area to load/unload furniture that was not on Broad Street, and failed to implement safety measures on Broad Street to protect residents unloading/loading vehicles. Plaintiff sought millions of dollars in damages. Attorneys O’Brien and McCurdy filed preliminary objections arguing that neither the association nor the property management company owed a duty to Plaintiff, even if their employees directed Plaintiff to park on Broad Street (as was alleged in the Complaint). The attorneys argued that the accident occurred entirely on Broad Street, which is considered a State highway that is maintained by the Commonwealth. They further argued that under Pennsylvania law, an adjacent landowner to a public highway is not liable for physical harm caused to travelers upon the highway or persons lawfully using the highway. The attorneys argued that there was nothing on their clients’ property which contributed to and/or caused the injuries and damages to Plaintiff. They further argued that prior knowledge of others parking in an active lane of traffic on Broad Street in the past was irrelevant, since the area is not controlled or maintained by their clients. The Court agreed with the attorneys’ reasoning and issued an Order dismissing all claims against their clients, with prejudice.

MOODK PHILADELPHIA ATTORNEYS OBTAIN VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ALL DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS

Patricia A. Fecile-Moreland and Michael J. Joyce of MOODK’s Philadelphia office obtain early voluntary dismissal of discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act following the honorable discharge of a police officer due to PTSD, which was determined at arbitration to be non-service related. Plaintiff sought damages for the denial of the service-related pension, because he claimed the PTSD was a service injury and that the denial was discriminatory. The EEOC made a probable cause determination in plaintiff’s favor, but MOODK’s client did not want to conciliate the case. The plaintiff filed suit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Through early and aggressive brief writing in support of a motion to dismiss, the attorneys argued that the case must be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to timely exhaust his administrative remedies with the EEOC and for improperly pleading a claim for an ERISA violation. Upon the filing of the briefs, the plaintiff’s attorney agreed to dismiss the claims with prejudice prior to the filing on an Answer to the Complaint, the exchange of formal discovery between the parties, and the incurrence of significant defense costs on behalf of the client.

MOODK ATTORNEYS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE SUCCESS

Eileen Ford of MOODK’s Delaware office and David Helwig of MOODK’s Pittsburgh Office successfully guided their Texas-based client and lawyers in a motion to transfer venue in a Fair Labor Standards Act case (FLSA) from Delaware District Court to the appropriate District Court in Texas.   The opening brief was based on Delaware’s application of the two-step analysis pursuant to  28 U.S.C. 1404(a) factors as applied in the District of Delaware, including, but not limited to, that location of all the parties, evidence, documents, witnesses were located in and/or near the requested Texas district.    After submission of the opening motion and brief Plaintiffs conceded and notified the court the motion would not be contested. 

MOODK PHILADELPHIA ATTORNEY OBTAINS SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Mark P. Merlini of MOODK’s Philadelphia office obtained summary judgment in a prisoner civil rights case based on allegations related to denial of proper medical treatment for an alleged severe gluten allergy.  Plaintiff claimed that consultants had recommended a biopsy and Gastroenterology consult and that he was constitutionally entitled to all testing and medical consults suggested.  Our team was able to demonstrate that the prison medical staff did perform a proper work up, the evidence did not support a severe gluten allergy and there was no constitutional violation by anyone on the medical staff.  Magistrate Judge Lisa Lenihan recommended dismissal of all claims and US District Judge Stephanie L. Haines granted dismissal.  The Third Circuit subsequently affirmed this decision on June 8, 2022. 

MOODK PHILADELPHIA ATTORNEY SECURES DISMISSAL IN SLIP AND FALL MATTER

Craig Renitsky of MOODK’s Philadelphia office represented the owner/landlord of a business complex that was leased out a tenant, who was Plaintiff’s employer and our named insured.  Plaintiff slipped and fell on an allegedly icy parking lot, sustaining neuro-cognitive injuries.  The named insured was barred from suit pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act, and pursuant to our interpretation of the landlord/tenant agreement along with the deposition testimony of all parties and multiple non-parties, we filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of the owner/landlord based on the theory of Landlord out of Possession. Plaintiffs responded in opposition, but the Motion was granted without argument, dismissing our client from suit.  Plaintiffs’ most recent demand was $1.25 Million.