Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Challenge to Settlement

On June 10, 2013, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by citizens of the Town of Dewey Beach, Delaware seeking to overturn the settlement of an earlier lawsuit brought against the Town by a property owner seeking to redevelop a parcel of land within the Town.

The court en banc heard oral argument in Murray v. Town of Dewey Beach, et al. on April 10, and issued an opinion applying a statute of repose found at 10 Del. C. §8126 to hold that the Plaintiffs’ claims were untimely and therefore barred.  In so holding, the court agreed with the arguments advanced by the Town and the property owner, that 10 Del. C. §8126, which provides that challenges to certain types of land use actions must be brought within 60 days after public notice of the actions, was intended to be broadly construed.

Megan Mantzavinos, Esquire, a partner in Marks O’Neill’s Delaware office, argued the case on behalf of the Town of Dewey Beach.

Sean X. Kelly and David Helwig Publish Article on Sandy Litigation

The latest edition of Declarations, the periodical issued by the International Association of Claims Professionals, includes the feature article The Storm Continues:  Third Party Claims in the Aftermath of Sandy.   David Helwig and Sean Kelly analyzed the repercussions of the storm from an insurance perspective and highlight the anticipated third party litigation likely to ensue in the aftermath of the storm.  A copy of the article may be accessed through this link: AICP article.

New Jersey Supreme Court grants Certification on Interpretation of New Jersey Civil Rights Act

Sean Kelly from Marks O’Neill’s New Jersey office successfully obtained dismissal in two related matters involving allegations of violations of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act by a local business.  Both matters have worked their way through the Appellate courts.   The New Jersey Supreme Court recently agreed to grant Certification in both matters.  The issue to be resolved will be whether the language of the New Jersey Civil Rights Act permits constitutional claims to be brought against private individuals, or only those acting under color of state law.