Attorney from New Jersey Office Obtain Summary Judgment in Attorney Malpractice Case

Sean X. Kelly of Marks, O’Neill’s New Jersey office recently obtained summary judgment in an attorney malpractice case, which alleged that an attorney was negligent for failing to fully explain the terms of a settlement agreement to a client.  Our team filed a motion seeking to strike plaintiff’s expert,  arguing that the report and testimony constituted a baseless net opinion. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing.  After cross-examination, the Court struck the experts testimony agreeing with our position that the expert misstated the standard of care and that there was no evidence in the record that the plaintiff would have fared better at trial.  In the absence of an expert, the Court dismissed the case with prejudice.

 

Attorney from Philadelphia Office Successfully Sustain Preliminary Objections

J. Mark Pecci, II of Marks O’Neill’s Philadelphia office was successful in having Preliminary Objections sustained in Philadelphia County. Defendant, a New Jersey bar, was sued by a Plaintiff estate for a death which occurred in Philadelphia. Preliminary Objections were filed by the bar seeking dismissal of the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Preliminary Objections argued that the bar did not maintain significant contacts with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for jurisdiction to be appropriate. The Philadelphia Trial Court sustained the preliminary objections and dismissed the claims against the bar.